{"id":12848,"date":"2021-04-13T07:37:26","date_gmt":"2021-04-13T07:37:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shp.al\/?page_id=12848"},"modified":"2021-04-14T08:35:18","modified_gmt":"2021-04-14T08:35:18","slug":"vendimi-i-pare-i-gjykates-se-strazburgut-ne-lidhje-me-vaksinimin-e-detyrueshem-te-femijeve-nuk-ka-shkelje-te-konventes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/azhurnime-ligjore\/vendimi-i-pare-i-gjykates-se-strazburgut-ne-lidhje-me-vaksinimin-e-detyrueshem-te-femijeve-nuk-ka-shkelje-te-konventes\/","title":{"rendered":"Vendimi i par\u00eb i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Strazburgut n\u00eb lidhje me vaksinimin e detyruesh\u00ebm t\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00ebve. Nuk ka shkelje t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs"},"content":{"rendered":"

Me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 08.04.2021, Gjykata Evropiane e t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut, me shumic\u00eb votash (gjasht\u00ebmb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb me nj\u00eb) n\u00eb c\u00ebshtjen Vavricka dhe t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt kund\u00ebr Republik\u00ebs \u00c7eke<\/em>, vendosi se nuk ka pasur asnj\u00eb shkelje e nenit 8 (e drejta p\u00ebr respektimin e jet\u00ebs private) t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs Evropiane t\u00eb t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut.<\/p>\n

Ky vendim ka v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb balanc\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb respektuar jet\u00ebn private duke zgjedhur t\u00eb mos jesh i detyruar t\u00eb b\u00ebsh vaksinimin e detyruesh\u00ebm ( e drejta e prind\u00ebrve p\u00ebr f\u00ebmij\u00ebt) dhe t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur interesin publik n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet vaksinimit t\u00eb detyruesh\u00ebm si mas\u00eb mjek\u00ebsore e vendosur nga autoritetet shtet\u00ebrore p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur sh\u00ebndetin individual dhe publik kund\u00ebr s\u00ebmundjeve ngjit\u00ebse.<\/p>\n

N\u00eb Republik\u00ebn \u00c7eke, \u00ebsht\u00eb e detyrueshme vaksinimi i t\u00eb gjith\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00ebve kund\u00ebr disa (n\u00ebnt\u00eb) s\u00ebmundjeve, t\u00eb cilat jan\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00ebnjohura nga mjek\u00ebsia. T\u00eb gjith\u00eb prind\u00ebrit t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk pajtohen me k\u00ebt\u00eb detyrim, pa nj\u00eb arsye t\u00eb besueshme, mund t\u00eb gjobiten. F\u00ebmij\u00ebt e pavaksinuar nuk pranohen n\u00eb cerdhe (me p\u00ebrjashtim t\u00eb atyre f\u00ebmij\u00ebve q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb vaksinohen p\u00ebr arsye sh\u00ebndetsore).<\/p>\n

N\u00eb c\u00ebshtjen n\u00eb shqyrtim, k\u00ebrkuesi i par\u00eb u gjobit p\u00ebr mosrespektim t\u00eb detyrimit t\u00eb tij p\u00ebr b\u00ebr\u00eb vaksinimin e detyruesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr dy f\u00ebmij\u00ebt e tij. Edhe k\u00ebrkuesve t\u00eb tjer\u00eb iu \u00ebsht\u00eb refuzuar pranimi n\u00eb \u00e7erdhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn arsye.<\/p>\n

Gjykata vuri n\u00eb dukje se, sipas praktik\u00ebs s\u00eb saj gjyq\u00ebsore, vaksinimi i detyruesh\u00ebm, si nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje e pavullnetshme mjek\u00ebsore, p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebson nj\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyrje n\u00eb integritetin fizik t\u00eb njeriut dhe k\u00ebshtu ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb respektuar jet\u00ebn private<\/strong>, t\u00eb mbrojtur nga neni 8 i Konvent\u00ebs.<\/p>\n

Gjykata ka pranuar se politika \u00c7eke ka ndjekur q\u00ebllimet legjitime t\u00eb mbrojtjes s\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit, si dhe t\u00eb drejtat e t\u00eb tjer\u00ebve, duke v\u00ebrjetur se vaksinimi mbron si ata q\u00eb e marrin vaksin\u00ebn ashtu edhe ata q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb vaksinohen p\u00ebr arsye mjek\u00ebsore, dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye mb\u00ebshteten n\u00eb imunitetin e tuf\u00ebs p\u00ebr mbrojtjen kund\u00ebr s\u00ebmundjeve ngjit\u00ebse. M\u00eb tej gjykata ka konsideruar se nj\u00eb \u201cmarzh i gj\u00ebr\u00eb vler\u00ebsimi<\/em>\u201d ishte i p\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm p\u00ebr shtetin e paditur (Republik\u00ebn \u00c7eke) n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst.<\/p>\n

Gjykata ka v\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb dukje se n\u00eb Republik\u00ebn \u00c7eke, detyra e vaksinimit \u00ebsht\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur fuqimisht nga autoritetet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse mjek\u00ebsore t\u00eb cilat i jan\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjur nevoj\u00ebs s\u00eb ngutshme shoq\u00ebrore p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbrojtur sh\u00ebndetin individual dhe publik kund\u00ebrs s\u00ebmundjeve n\u00eb fjal\u00eb dhe p\u00ebr tu mbrojtur nga cdo trend n\u00eb r\u00ebnie i shkall\u00ebs s\u00eb vaksinimit midis f\u00ebmij\u00ebve.<\/p>\n

Gjykata ka theksuar se n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha vendimet q\u00eb lidhen me f\u00ebmij\u00ebt, interesat e tyre duhet t\u00eb jen\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsie t\u00eb madhe.\u00a0 N\u00eb lidhje me imunizimin, objektivi duhet t\u00eb jet\u00eb q\u00eb cdo f\u00ebmij\u00eb t\u00eb mbrohet nga s\u00ebmundjet p\u00ebrmes vaksinimit ose p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb imunitetit t\u00eb tuf\u00ebs. Prandaj mund t\u00eb thuhet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast se politika sh\u00ebndetsore \u00c7eke \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me interesat m\u00eb t\u00eb larta t\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00ebve<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Gjykata shqyrtoi proporcionalitetin e politik\u00ebs s\u00eb vaksinave. Gjykata vuri n\u00eb dukje q\u00ebllimin dhe p\u00ebrmbajtjen e detyrimit p\u00ebr tu vaksinuar, p\u00ebrjashtimet ekzistuese ndaj vaksin\u00ebs dhe masat mbrojt\u00ebse procedurale n\u00eb dispozicion. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, p\u00ebr sa i p\u00ebrket rrethanave specifike t\u00eb ankuesve, gjykata vuri n\u00eb dukje se gjoba e vendosur ndaj z. Vavricka nuk kishte q\u00ebn\u00eb e tepruar<\/strong>. Megjith\u00ebse mospranimi i f\u00ebmij\u00ebve t\u00eb ankueseve n\u00eb sistemin parashkollor, n\u00ebnkuptonte humbjen e nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsie t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme p\u00ebr t\u00eb zhvilluar personalitetin e tyre, kjo ishte m\u00eb tep\u00ebr nj\u00eb mas\u00eb parandaluese sesa nj\u00eb mas\u00eb nd\u00ebshkuese<\/strong>, e cila ishte e kufizuar n\u00eb koh\u00eb, pra lidhej vet\u00ebm me koh\u00ebn derisa f\u00ebmij\u00ebt t\u00eb mbushnin mosh\u00ebn e frekuentimit t\u00eb detyruesh\u00ebm t\u00eb shkoll\u00ebs dhe pranimi i tyre n\u00eb shkoll\u00ebn fillore nuk ishte prekur nga statusi i tyre i vaksinimit.<\/p>\n

Si pasoj\u00eb, masat nd\u00ebshkimore p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat jan\u00eb ankuar aplikant\u00ebt, t\u00eb vler\u00ebsuara n\u00eb kontekstin e sistemit komb\u00ebtar, kan\u00eb q\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie t\u00eb arsyeshme proporcionaliteti me q\u00ebllimet legjitime t\u00eb ndjekura nga shteti \u00c7ek (mbrojtja kund\u00ebr s\u00ebmundjeve t\u00eb cilat mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebjn\u00eb nj\u00eb rrezik serioz p\u00ebr sh\u00ebndetin) e realizuar kjo n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet vaksinimit t\u00eb detyruesh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n

Gjykata sqaroi p\u00ebrfundimisht se, c\u00ebshtja n\u00eb gjykim nuk kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me faktin n\u00ebse nga ana e shtetit \u00c7ek duhet t\u00eb adoptohej nj\u00eb politik\u00eb tjet\u00ebr e ndryshme dhe m\u00eb pak urdh\u00ebruese, sic \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb n\u00eb disa shtete t\u00eb tjera Europiane. P\u00ebrkundrazi, c\u00ebshtja ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me faktin n\u00ebse autoritetet \u00c7eke kishin tejkaluar vler\u00ebsimin n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e vaksinimit.<\/p>\n

Gjykata arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se masat e kund\u00ebrshtuara mund t\u00eb konsiderohen si \u201ct\u00eb nevojshme n\u00eb nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebri demokratike<\/em><\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Me vendimin e dat\u00ebs 08.04.2021, Gjykata Evropiane e t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut, me shumic\u00eb votash (gjasht\u00ebmb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb me nj\u00eb) n\u00eb c\u00ebshtjen Vavricka dhe t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt kund\u00ebr Republik\u00ebs \u00c7eke, vendosi se nuk ka pasur asnj\u00eb shkelje e nenit 8 (e drejta p\u00ebr respektimin e jet\u00ebs private) t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs Evropiane t\u00eb t\u00eb Drejtave t\u00eb Njeriut.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":12658,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"editor_plus_copied_stylings":"{}","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-12848","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12848"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12848\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12873,"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12848\/revisions\/12873"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/12658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shp.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}